Legal Opinion

Pollock v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1936No. L. A. 15309PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

In July of 1929, petitioner, Saul Pollock, was injured while working in the scope and course of his employment. At the time of his injury petitioner was fifteen years of age. After a. hearing duly had, respondent commission made an award in favor of petitioner in the sum of $1937.-19, payable in weekly instalments of $20.83 each. The record of that proceeding indicates that respondent insurance carrier was represented by counsel, actively participated at the hearing, and contested the award. The record of that hearing indicates that at the commencement of the proceeding before the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Flittner v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  2. Hakes Investment Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Tracy v. GaudinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Varian v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  2. Hurley v. Southern California Edison Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Burnand v. IrigoyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Holland v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Niemann v. DeverichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API