Peers v. McLaughlin
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Contra Costa County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtDe Haven, J.
The court below adjudged that defendant Thomas McLaughlin is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of $1,615.24, and that said indebtedness is a lien upon the land described in the complaint, and directed that it be sold to satisfy said lien. All of the defendants appeal from this judgment. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. The findings show the following facts: The defendants John Thomas Edward McLaughlin and Margaret McLaughlin are minor chil*296dren of. the defendant Thomas McLaughlin. In March, 1884, the plaintiffs and the defendant Thomas McLaughlin made an agreement, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Daggett v. RankinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Love v. Sierra Nevada Lake Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1867
- Remington v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by19 opinions
- Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Beckwith v. SheldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Estate of PittsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- E.K.D. ex rel. Dawes v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.