Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Chief Judge Cooke.
We hold that a manufacturer of a product may not be cast in damages, either on a strict products liability or negligence cause of action, where, after the product leaves the possession and control of the manufacturer, there is a subsequent modification which substantially alters the product and is the proximate cause of plaintiffs injuries.
Plaintiff Gerald Robinson, then 17, was employed as a plastic molding machine operator by third-party defendant Plastic Jewel Parts Co. A recent arrival to New York from *476South Carolina where he had been an itinerant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Bolm v. Triumph Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
- McLaughlin v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962
3Cited by338 opinions
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Liriano v. Hobart Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Denny v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Amatulli v. Delhi Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- McCarthy v. Olin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.