Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Reed-Prentice Division of Package Machinery Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1980PublishedCited by 338 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Chief Judge Cooke.

We hold that a manufacturer of a product may not be cast in damages, either on a strict products liability or negligence cause of action, where, after the product leaves the possession and control of the manufacturer, there is a subsequent modification which substantially alters the product and is the proximate cause of plaintiffs injuries.

Plaintiff Gerald Robinson, then 17, was employed as a plastic molding machine operator by third-party defendant Plastic Jewel Parts Co. A recent arrival to New York from *476South Carolina where he had been an itinerant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Micallef v. Miehle Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Codling v. PagliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Victorson v. Bock Laundry Machine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Bolm v. Triumph Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. McLaughlin v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1962

3Cited by338 opinions

  1. Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Liriano v. Hobart Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Denny v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Amatulli v. Delhi Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. McCarthy v. Olin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

333 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API