Legal Opinion

Tanya J. McCloskey, Acting Consumer Advocate v. PA PUC

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 11, 2018No. 1624 C.D. 2017PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY SENIOR JUDGE PELLEGRINI

Aqua Pennsylvania Wastewater, Inc. 1 (Aqua) filed an application with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission) under Sections 1329 and 1102 2 of the Public Utility Code (Code), 66 Pa.C.S. §§ 1329 & 1102, for the approval of the acquisition of the wastewater system assets of New Garden Township (Township) and the New Garden Sewer Authority (Authority) (collectively, New Garden), 3 a certificate of public convenience to furnish the wastewater service to the public in the Authority's service area as well as the approval of the ratemaking rate base…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Conestoga National Bank v. PattersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. York v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cicero, P. v. PUCSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  2. Cicero, P. v. PUC of: Aqua PA Wastewater IncSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  3. Cicero, P. v. PUC of: East Whiteland TwpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Consum Adv v. PUC; Apl of: Aqua PA Wastewater IncSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Consum Adv v. PUC; Apl of: East Whiteland TwpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API