State v. Bailey
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
In his first assignment of error defendant contends that the trial court erred in allowing the prosecuting attorney to cross-examine defendant about alleged prior sexual misconduct with a person other than the prosecuting witness. During defendant’s cross-examination, the following events took place:
Q. Have you had other women come up to you in the past and ask you for sexual favors as Mrs. Lancaster did on this occasion?
A. Not to my knowledge, sir.
Q. Have you ever had sexual relations with someone without their consent in the past?
A. Not to my knowledge.
Q. Have you ever…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. SmallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. LudlumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. . FennerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- State v. EmeryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. WoodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.