State v. Murphy
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support the charge of first degree sexual offense on 9 January and that the trial court committed reversible error in not granting his motion to dismiss. In ruling on a motion to dismiss, all evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the State, and the State is entitled to every reasonable inference to be drawn from the evidence. State v. Bell, 311 N.C. 131, 316 S.E.2d 611 (1984). Whether the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion depends upon whether there was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. KennedySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- State v. RameySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. MilbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. KinlockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. ReederCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
- State v. ReavesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.