Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1993No. 9213SC104PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*130EAGLES, Judge.

I

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the indictment in 91CrS3100 (first degree sexual offense) because the indictment failed to properly allege an offense as required by G.S. § 15-144.2 and G.S. § 15A-924. Specifically, defendant argues that the indictment was insufficient under G.S. § 15-144.2, G.S. § 15A-924 and State v. Dillard, 90 N.C. App. 320, 368 S.E.2d 422 (1988), because it failed to allege that the offense was committed with force and arms.

In State v. Corbett, 307 N.C. 169, 297 S.E.2d 553 (1982), our Supreme Court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Gates v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Monroe v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  5. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. State v. EaslerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. SakobieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. State v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
  5. State v. CorbettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API