Legal Opinion

People v. Dethloff

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 15, 1992No. B064774PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TAYLOR, J. *

The People appeal from the superior court’s denial of their motion to reinstate a complaint, made pursuant to Penal Code section 871.5. The magistrate had dismissed the complaint after granting the motion to suppress evidence made by defendant/respondent Jeffrey L. Dethloff (respondent).

Because we conclude that the People’s section 871.5 motion was untimely and, consequently, that the superior court was without jurisdiction to consider the matter, we dismiss this appeal.

Factual and Procedural Background

On December 5, 1990, pursuant to a felony complaint, respondent was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hollister Convalescent Hospital, Inc. v. RicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re HortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Griggs v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Los Angeles Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. People v. DiandaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  2. People v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. People v. HamptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Salven v. NijjarUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API