Legal Opinion

Griggs v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1976No. L.A. 30524PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WRIGHT, C. J.

Petitioner, Bertram S. Griggs, as Superintendent of the California Institution for Men at Chino (hereinafter Chino), seeks a writ of mandate to compel the respondent court to quash orders to show cause and to dismiss proceedings in each of three matters wherein the real parties in interest, while inmates at Chino, made applications for habeas corpus relief, At issue is the territorial limitation on the jurisdiction of superior courts to entertain petitions for and to grant relief in habeas corpus matters. We hold that such limitations as may have existed prior to 1966 were…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. In Re SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. People v. TenorioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. In Re CortezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  5. In Re CrowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ortiz-Sandoval v. GomezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  2. Briggs v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Kernan v. HinojosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  4. Robinson v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  5. People v. SeijasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API