Legal Opinion

People v. Dianda

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1986No. A030906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

POCHÉ, Acting P. J.

Penal Code section 871.5 specifies that “When an action is dismissed by a magistrate ... the prosecutor may make a motion in the superior court within 15 days to compel the magistrate to reinstate the complaint. . . -” We are required to determine, what it is that a prosecutor must do to “make a motion.”

Following the dismissal of criminal complaints against defendants Mark Dianda, James Smothers, and Ronald Phoenix, the prosecutor filed separate written motions pursuant to this statute for orders reinstating the complaints. Each motion was filed within 15 days of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. Ah SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. People v. SkoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Beck v. County of San MateoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. Johnston v. AlexisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ChildsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. People v. DethloffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Los Angeles Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API