Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1994No. B085370PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EPSTEIN, Acting P. J.

A magistrate purported to reduce two felony charges to misdemeanors because she believed the evidence presented at the preliminary hearing was insufficient to hold the defendant to answer felony charges. Neither offense was a felony-misdemeanor (wobbler) as to which the reduced crime was a misdemeanor. We conclude the magistrate was without power to reduce the offenses to these misdemeanors, and that her doing so amounted to a dismissal of the felony charges. The district attorney brought a Penal Code section 871.5 motion, but the superior court declined to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. SlaughterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Ramos v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. MendezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. BeebeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Jose Lopez-Vasquez v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. People v. FeyrerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. People v. Lee, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. People v. TraylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API