Legal Opinion
In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of Dunn
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 18, 1973PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
A decree of dissolution of the above entitled marriage was entered. Under that decree the mother was awarded the custody of the two remaining minor children, with $100 per month child support for each. The husband appeals.
His principal contention is that there was insufficient evidence to support the court’s finding that there were irreconcilable differences or its conclusion that such differences were irremediable, within the meaning of ORS 107.025.
ORS 107.025 is probably the key section, so far as expressing the legislative philosophy which under-girded the adoption of the 1971 “no fault”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Marriage of McKimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Unander v. UnanderOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Harsco Corp. v. Department of Public WorksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caffyn v. CaffynMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Woodruff v. WoodruffSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- A.C. v. D.R.New York Supreme Court · 2011
- Townes v. CokerNew York Supreme Court · 2012
- Eversman v. EversmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.