United States v. Blucker
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
*691OPINION OF THE COURT ON RECONSIDERATION
GILLEY, Judge:
Following our decision of 17 November 1989 in this case, in which we set aside portions of the findings of guilty due to duplicity, the government petitioned for reconsideration by the court sitting as a whole. However, we have vacated our previous decision and, upon reconsideration, issue this decision.1
Pursuant to his pleas, a military judge found that the appellant did “wrongfully possess and distribute” 4.4 grams of marijuana in the hashish form on 21 April 1988 and 12.7 such grams on 22 April 1988, in violation of Article 112a, Uniform…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. JemmingsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. PooleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. McMillianUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. HoltU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. JacksonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. ManginellU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. AndersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993