Legal Opinion
Clinton v. Aetna Life & Surety Co.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 23, 1991No. File 325312SPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSatter, J.
The plaintiff has sued the defendant insurance company for attorney’s fees and expenses incurred to defend a claim that the plaintiff asserts was covered by the defendant’s policy.
The facts are as follows. The plaintiff, a Connecticut resident, dealt with a Connecticut broker to obtain insurance coverage for her Florida rental property. An apartment package policy was issued to the plaintiff by the defendant’s Florida agent. It contains a Florida amendatory windstorm or hailstorm endorsement and provides that if the terms of the policy conflict with the statutes of the state where issued…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. PeppersIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- SOLO CUP COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Breen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Powell v. Alemaz, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Middlesex Insurance v. MaraDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Edo Corp. v. Newark Ins. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1995
- Groshong v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Vermont Mutual Insurance v. CicconeDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.