Legal Opinion

Motorists Mutual Insurance v. Bill

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1978No. 78-381PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The first basic issue presented by this appeal is whether the acts of the minor under the facts of this cause, where the minor being pursued by the police and driving an automobile at a high rate of speed, ran through stop signs and collided with and damaged the plaintiff’s parked automobile, constitute, under the intent of R. C. 3109.09, “willfully” damaging the property of the plaintiff.. The second basic issue presented by this appeal is whether an action for any such willful damage to property, if. so found, may under this statute be brought against *261the parents of the minor by the owner’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tighe v. DiamondOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  2. General Insurance Company of America v. FaulknerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Reserve Trucking Co. v. FairchildOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Potomac Insurance Company v. TorresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Bailey v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McKinney v. Hartz & Restle Realtors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Byrd v. BrandeburgDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
  3. Preston v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Peterson v. SloneOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BorchersOhio Court of Appeals · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API