Freundt v. Hahn
Washington Supreme Court
\ppeal from Superior Court, King County.; — Ron E. I). Benson, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
Tiie opinion of the court was delivered by
Reavis, C. J.
Action brought in March, 1899, against appellants, who were then and at all times mentioned residents of California; jurisdiction was obtained by attachment in this state, to recover upon two promissory notes executed by Charles Hahn and one R. Wittke. There are two causes of action alleged in the complaint, which are identical except as to the amounts of the notes and the allegations of payment thereon. The first note was for $1,200, made in Los Angeles, Cal., February 7, 1888, and the last payment thereon made January 19, 1895. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Steele v. Commissioners of RutherfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
- Osgood v. ArttDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1882
- Berry v. KroneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1892
- Emerson v. SteamboatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bruner v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Arthur & Co. v. BurkeWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- West v. TheisIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Runkle v. PullinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
- Chandler v. HumphreyWashington Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.