Legal Opinion

Berry v. Krone

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 11, 1892PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In error to the Circuit Court of Cass County; the lion. Lymah Lacey, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wall

This was a proceeding by scire facias to make the plaintiff in error party to a judgment against one Uriah Hutchings. The original action was assumpsit upon a promissory note for $275, dated October 25, 1878, payable to Henry Krone, now deceased, one year after date, and signed by Hutchings & Berry. The summons was returned served on Hutchings but no return was made as to Berry. Hutchings failed to appear; his default was entered, and the amount due on the note having been ascertained by computation, on a reference to the clerk judgment was duly entered. It is objected now, as it was below,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Higgins v. SpringAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Newell Co. v. PetersenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  2. Coan v. Cessna AircraftIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Orschel v. RothschildAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  4. Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. TownsendAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  5. Freundt v. HahnWashington Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API