Runkle v. Pullin
Indiana Court of Appeals
Action by Luther W. Pullin against James M. Runkle. From a judgment, for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFelt, C. J.
Appellee brought this action to recover money which he had paid as surety for appellant on a certain promissory note. On the trial, the court made a special finding of facts, and stated as its conclusion thereon that appellee was entitled to recover from appellant the sum of $319.28. ■
Appellant relies for reversal on the following alleged errors: (1) Overruling appellant’s demurrer to the complaint; (2) sustaining appellee’s demurrer to the second paragraph of appellant’s answer; (3) error of the court in its conclusion of law; (4) error of the court in overruling appellant’s motion in arrest…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hibernia National Bank v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Eingartner v. Illinois Steel Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Bruner v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Monnett v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Wooley v. YarnellIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Company v. Latrobe Die Castingcompany, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Prince v. Trustees of University of PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1968
- Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. v. WinstonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
- Lilly Industries, Inc. v. Health-Chem Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1997
- Terranova v. TerranovaDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.