Legal Opinion

Chandler v. Humphrey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1934No. 24808. En BancPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Main, J. —

This action was brought to recover upon the superadded liability of stockholders in an insolvent corporation. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which the court concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to recover. Judgment was entered against the defendants in the sum of $1,635, from which they appeal.

The facts are these: The Diamond Motor Parts Company was a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Minnesota. The appellants were stockholders in the corporation. January 23, 1929, the cor poration being insolvent, the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Rodman v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  3. Brunswick Terminal Co. v. National Bank of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1900
  4. Swisher v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  5. Freundt v. HahnWashington Supreme Court · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maria Cardwell Tomlin, and Christine Williams Harrell v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  2. Sobo v. SoboCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Krussow v. StixrudWashington Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API