Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Wolff

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 16, 1941No. 14,734PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bakke

Suit by defendant in error, to whom we hereinafter refer as plaintiff, or Wolff, to enforce payment of real estate broker’s commission against plaintiff in error, hereinafter designated as defendant, or Thompson. After issues were joined, the matter was submitted to the trial court who gave judgment for plaintiff. Thompson seeks reversal on a writ of error.

Thompson admits listing the property with Wolff, and another real estate man named Keezer, about November 1, 1938, and there may have been some question as to whether Wolff or Keezer, through his salesman, Heddeen, first contacted Wilkes as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Babcock v. MerrittColorado Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. BABCOCK v. MERRITTColorado Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Dickey v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1941
  4. Houston v. H. G. Wolff & Son Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Minissale v. ElmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  2. Minissale v. ElmerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API