Legal Opinion

Moore v. Knightdale Board of Elections

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 24, 1992No. 480PA91PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Justice.

Plaintiffs Carl A. Moore and Vernon Charles Bullock won election to the Knightdale Town Council in 1989 for terms to expire in 1993. More than forty days before the termination of their council terms both sought to become candidates for mayor of Knightdale, which office was scheduled to be filled by election on 5 November 1991. Pursuant to the authority of N.C.G.S. § 163-125, defendant, the Knightdale Board of Elections, refused to allow plaintiffs to file for the office of mayor until they resigned their seats on the council. Effective 1 January 1991, section 163-425(a)…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Martin v. PrestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. Hoke v. . HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
  3. People Ex Rel. Burby v. . HowlandNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Holley v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
  5. Baker v. MartinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. GradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  2. Cooper v. BergerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  3. Guilford County Board of Education v. Guilford County Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Comer v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Household Finance Corp. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API