Legal Opinion

Smith v. . Wilkins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 3, 1913PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In S. v. Worth, 116 N.C. 1010, the Court defines the term "trades" as including "any employment or business embarked in for gain or profit," and while the Constitution, Art. V, sec. 3, is mandatory upon the General Assembly to levy a tax upon all property and by a uniform rule, the authority to tax trades is permissive only, and no rule as to the method is prescribed.

It has, however, been held that the rule of uniformity applies to the tax on trades, but only to the extent that it must be equal upon all persons belonging to the class upon which it is imposed. Gatlin v. Tarboro,78 N.C. 122;…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Supervisors v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Railroad Companies v. SchutteSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  5. Gatlin v. Town of TarboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Leonard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. State v. . BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  3. State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. State v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. State v. TranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API