Legal Opinion
Zolman v. Pinnacol Assurance
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided March 3, 2011No. 09CA1954PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge LOEB.
In this insurance bad faith case, plaintiff, Charlotte Zolman, appeals the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendant, Pinnacol Assurance (Pinnacol). Zolman also appeals the court's denial of her C.R.C.P. 59 motion for reconsideration. We affirm.
I. Background and Procedural History
Zolman was employed as a personal companion by Horizon Home Care, LLC (Horizon). This job required her to provide a variety of non-medical home care services to elderly or disabled individuals. On December 3, 2004, Zolman injured her lower back as she was lifting a client's…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Joan Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company, and the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company Unumprovident Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Rawlings v. ApodacaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Vaccaro v. American Family Insurance GroupColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Home Loan Investment Co. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Schuessler v. WolterColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- McDonald v. Zions First National Bank, N.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
- Baker v. Allied Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2013
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.