Legal Opinion

Peabody v. Prince

California Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1889No. 11922PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

The complaint is ejectment in the usual form. The defendant pleaded, by way of cross-complaint, in substance, that the.lands in controversy were properly listed, and on or about .March 1, 1869, relinquished and certified over to the state of California by the United States as lieu lands; that on the twenty-first day of March, 1870, the plaintiff .made application to purchase the same from the state,-which application was approved by the surveyor-general February 12,1872; that plaintiff paid to the county treasurer of the proper county the amount required by law to be paid on the land, but did…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Pixley v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Burrell v. HawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Christman v. BrainardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Wright v. LaugenourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Burrell v. HawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Payne Butler v. Providence Gas CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1910
  2. Galvin v. PalmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Switzer v. YuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Cucamonga Fruit-Land Co. v. MoirCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Ewbank v. MikelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API