Legal Opinion

Burrell v. Haw

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874No. 3,599PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, Humboldt County. Special issues were submitted to the jury who returned their findings thereon. The Court below, on these findings, rendered judgment for the defendant; the plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was denied, and he then appealed from the judgment and from the order denying the motion for a new trial.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the District Court of the Eighth Judicial District, Humboldt County. Special issues were submitted to the jury who returned their findings thereon. The Court below, on these findings, rendered judgment for the defendant; the plaintiff moved for a new trial, which was denied, and he then appealed from the judgment and from the order denying the motion for a new trial. (A report of this case on a former appeal will be found in the 40 Cal. 373.) The other facts are stated in the opinion of Judgá Haynes, of the District Court, which is indorsed in the opinion of the Supreme Court, and…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

For the reasons set forth in the opinion of the learned Judge of the District Court, the judgment and order denying new trial herein are affirmed.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peabody v. PrinceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Lynch v. BrighamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Rutledge v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API