Legal Opinion

Ewbank v. Mikel

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 30, 1907No. Civ. No. 338Published

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.

Action to obtain a decree that the legal title to certain state land, evidenced by a patent from the state to the defendant, is held by defendant in trust for plaintiff. A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend, and plaintiff appeals from the judgment dismissing the action.

The land in question is the east half of section 35, township 21 south, range 19 east, Mount Diablo base and meridian, being land uncovered by the, recession of the waters of Tulare lake, and which thus became state lands. It is averred in the complaint that said section 35 was surveyed and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Pixley v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Robinson v. ForrestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Plummer v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. McFaul v. PfankuchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Hinckley v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API