People ex rel. Pixley v. Stratton
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court, Third Judicial District, Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court, Currey, J.
The Attorney-General filed his information on the 6th of July, 3.863, in the District Court of the Third Judicial District, in and for the County of Alameda, against the defendant, for the purpose of having the Court declare void and annul a patent for lands granted by the Governor of the State of California to the defendant, in April, 1862. The defendant was brought into Court by proper process and filed his answer to the information.
From the information it appears that in November, 1863, the defendant commenced proceedings, under the Acts of the Legislature providing…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- Doe Ex Dem. Patterson v. WinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- John Goodtitle v. Gaius KibbeSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Doll v. MeadorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
3Cited by31 opinions
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. Gold Run Ditch & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
- People v. Truckee Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Pierce v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- People v. Oakland Water Front Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.