Legal Opinion

King v. Burris

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1952No. 3530PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIS, Judge.

Plaintiff sued in tort for damages because of the alleged negligent escape of fire from the land of the defendant, Burris, on to lands of the plaintiff, King.

The suit was filed September 11, 1951, and on October 1, 1951 the defendant filed exceptions of no right or cause of action and of vagueness. On October 5, 1951 the exceptions were argued and the trial court overruled the exceptions of no cause and no right of action, but sustained the exception of vagueness, ordering the plaintiff to amend his petition within 20 days, directing counsel for plaintiff to give in the amendment…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Succession of RobinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  2. City of New Orleans v. Le BourgeoisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  3. Tremont Lumber Co. v. MaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
  4. Goldsmith v. VirginSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
  5. Southport Mill, Ltd. v. FriedrichsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Franks v. City of AlexandriaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Davis v. European MotorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Russell v. VanceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Melanie Henry v. The Board of Supervisors of the Louisiana Community and Technical College System, and Earl Meador, Individually and in his official capacity as Director of South Central Louisiana Technical College, Young Memorial CampusLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API