Legal Opinion

Succession of Robinson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided December 21, 1936No. 34078PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment where the trial judge refused to reopen the case, after argument, to receive the testimony of another witness, declined to grant a new trial, and dismissed appellant’s opposition to the executrix’ account.

The opposition was filed by a duly licensed attorney at law to the account of the executrix of the succession of John M. Robinson, claiming, on a quantum meruit basis, to be a creditor for the sum of $5,000, for legal services rendered in confecting the olographic will of the deceased. The executrix had refused to recognize the claim but did…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of New Orleans v. Le BourgeoisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1898
  2. State ex rel. Shreveport Cotton Oil Co. v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  3. Burthe v. LeeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Muller v. HothSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  5. Nessans v. ColomesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Thibodeaux v. BurtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Lamb v. LambSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  3. Miller v. Chicago Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  4. Hardy v. KidderSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  5. De Frances v. GauthierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1951

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API