Legal Opinion
Southport Mill, Ltd. v. Friedrichs
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided October 29, 1928No. 28217PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment rendered against him on a rule” for judgment on the original pleadings.
Plaintiff’s suit is for the recovery from defendant of the sum of $5,000, retained by him as a commission from the deposit of $10,000, made to bind the agreement for the sale and purchase of certain real estate, which was annulled by this court in Southport Mill, Ltd., v. Ansley, 160 La. 131, 106 So. 720.
The answer of the defendant was filed only after his exceptions of vagueness, and no cause of action had been overruled. When the rule for judgment was called for hearing, defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southport Mill, Ltd. v. AnsleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Meyer v. FarmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1884
- Widow & Heirs of Koerber v. New Orleans Levee BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- Breaux Bridge Lumber Co. v. HebertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
- Strange v. CarrawaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hall v. Barlow CorporationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
- Dupre v. Consolidated UnderwritersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Livingston v. Southport Mill, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Southport Mill, Ltd. v. FriedrichsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.