Legal Opinion
Goldsmith v. Virgin
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided January 18, 1909No. 17,091PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; John St. Paul, Judge. Action by Mary Goldsmith against U. J. Virgin. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtNigholls, J.
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing her demand upon an exception of no cause of action. The petition filed by her contained the following allegations :
“That U. J. Virgin owes to her $2,162, because, on the 17th of August, 1906, the said U. J. Virgin leased to petitioner the premises No. 135 South Rampart street, between Canal and Tulane avenue, from the 1st of September, 1906, to the 31st of August, 1907, as appears by the written instrument filed in No. 83,676, civil district court.
“That it was well known to the said U. J. Virgin that the said property was leased for the purpose…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Levy v. MaddenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
3Cited by21 opinions
- Haskins v. ClarySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Acme Stores, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of Baton Rouge, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1954
- Klumpp v. XYZ Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- Saxena v. SaxenaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Gonsouland v. RosomanoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1910
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.