Legal Opinion

Williamson v. Pavlovich

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1989No. 88-834PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The central issue presented in this case is whether illegally parked cars along a highway, which contribute generally to traffic congestion, create a nuisance for which a municipality may be held liable. Also at issue is whether a municipality may be found liable for failing to install certain traffic signs, or failing to enforce existing ones. The appellees asserted below that a question of fact was presented regarding whether there was an actionable nuisance by the presence of parked cars located on Barber Avenue on or about May 8, 1984, and therefore, a directed verdict was improperly…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Taylor v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Haverlack v. Portage Homes, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Enghauser Manufacturing Co. v. Eriksson Engineering Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Sawicki v. Village of Ottawa HillsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. City of Wooster v. ArbenzOhio Supreme Court · 1927

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Wallace v. Ohio Dept. of CommerceOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Franks v. LopezOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Ohio Hospital Ass'n v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Manufacturer's National Bank v. Erie County Road CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API