Legal Opinion
Markley v. City Council
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 12, 1982No. Civ. 62615PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LA VINE, J. *
This is an appeal from a judgment denying a peremptory writ of mandate. By judgment the court determined that “there was adequate notice, substantial evidence and requisite findings to support the administrative agency actions below.” In so doing, the court upheld the city council’s approval of tentative tract No. 37481 for construction of 115 condominium units and 6 maids’ quarters in the Westwood-Wilshire area of the City of Los Angeles.
Facts
The proposed project is a new 20-story condominium complex with subterranean parking in an area along Wilshire Boulevard presently…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Horn v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Defend the Bay v. City of IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Village Laguna of Laguna Beach, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Porterville Citizens for Responsible Hillside Development v. City of PortervilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Sagaser v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.