Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Friedman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 18, 1959No. 58-491PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

112 So.2d 894 (1959)

Eric PEARSON, Appellant,

v.

Milton FRIEDMAN, Appellee.

No. 58-491.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.

June 18, 1959.

Morton N. Greenwald, No. Miami Beach for appellant.

Jerry M. Lindzon, Miami, for appellee.

CARROLL, CHAS., Chief Judge.

This appeal brings on for our determination a question of the enforceability in Florida courts of a confession judgment rendered in Illinois, based on a warrant of attorney for confession of judgment which was signed and delivered in Florida incident to a promissory note made here but payable in Illinois.

Upon default the holder of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. BarnesIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Burr v. BecklerIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Carroll v. GoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Monarch Refrigerating Co. v. FaulkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. United Mercantile Agencies v. BissonnetteSupreme Court of Florida · 1944

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harold Vineberg and Peter Demet v. Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. A.J. Spagnol Lumber Co. v. TraugerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API