Legal Opinion

Barber v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 8, 1941No. C. D. 492PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dallingee., Judge:

These are suits against the United States, arising at the port of Boston, brought to recover certain customs duties alleged to have been improperly exacted upon particular importations of motorboats imported minus their motors. Duty was levied thereon at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 370 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as parts of motorboats. It is claimed that said articles are properly dutiable at but 15 per centum ad valorem under the following provision in the trade agreement with Canada, promulgated in T. D. 49752, 74 Treas. Dec. 235, amending said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. RigaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1909
  3. United States v. BergerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  4. United States v. International Forwarding Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Richard v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newman Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Healthway's, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  3. Hudson Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. Baldt Anchor, Chain & Forge Division of the Boston Metals Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API