Legal Opinion

Pistorino & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 10, 1964No. C.D. 2491PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, Judge

The letter of the collector of customs transmitting the above protest to the court states that the merchandise in controversy “* * * was classified in liquidation as Metal stampings as Latch Needles.” Duty was assessed thereon at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem, plus $1 per thousand, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 343 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1001, par. 343), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, supplemented by Presidential notification, 86 Treas. Dec. 337, T.D. 52820.

It is claimed by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Worthington v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Athenia Steel & Wire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. National Importing Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  5. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John V. Carr & Son, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  2. Pistorino & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API