Legal Opinion

Richard v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 11, 1913No. 1200PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7459 (T. D. 33405).

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

This case relates to violin finger boards, violin necks, violin pegs, and violin bridges of wood, all of which were assessed by the collector and, on appeal, held by the Board of General Appraisers, to be dutiable as parts of musical instruments at 45 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 467 of the tariff act of 1909, of which we quote the material part:

467. Musical instruments or parts thereof, * * * forty-five per centum ad valorem.

It is stated by the board in its decision that “ each of these articles was specially prepared for use in the construction of the musical instrument indicated by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Magone v. WiedererSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Athenia Steel & Wire Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. United States v. RigaU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1909
  4. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  2. Hoenecke v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. Fischer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Herman D. Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Waltham Watch Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API