Legal Opinion

United States v. International Forwarding Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 27, 1927No. 2768PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarber, Judge

Paragraph 1111 of the Tariff Act of 1922, aside from the last part which provides for varying rates of duty, is as follows:

Blankets and similar articles, including carriage and automobile robes and steamer rugs, made of blanketing, wholly or in chief value of wool, not exceeding 3 yards in length, * * * valued at not more than 50 cents per pound, 18 cents per pound and 30 per centum ad valorem; * * *

The merchandise in this case consists of rectangular articles of blanketing material, made of wool, imported in lengths varying from 4 to 4Y% and 5 yards. Exhibit 1, introduced as a sample of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. CitroenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Merritt v. WelshSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. United States v. Buss & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  4. Snow's United States Sample Express Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  5. Rogers v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barber v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  2. Harry Harris & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Varsity Watch Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947
  4. Park Avenue Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  5. Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API