Legal Opinion

Gallenberg Equipment, Inc. v. Agromac International, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 12, 1998No. 96-C-991PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ADELMAN, District Judge.

This case is about corporate successor liability. In general, a corporation that purchases the assets of another corporation does not succeed to the seller’s liabilities. However there are exceptions to the general rule. The question in the case is whether the dealership agreement between plaintiff, Gal-lenberg, and the defendant predecessor, the Lockwood Company, is within one of the exceptions and therefore binding on the defendant Agromae. I hold that it is not.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Gallenberg Equipment, Inc., a Wisconsin corporation…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Golden State Bottling Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fizzano Brothers Concrete Products, Inc. v. XLN, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  2. Gladstone v. Stuart Cinemas, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  3. Bielagus v. EMRE of New Hampshire Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. Glentel, Inc. v. Wireless Ventures, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2005
  5. Smith v. Meadows Mills, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API