Fizzano Brothers Concrete Products, Inc. v. XLN, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice McCAFFERY.
At issue in this appeal is a question of corporate successor liability under the de facto merger doctrine or exception. The trial court concluded that XLNT Software Solutions, Inc. (“XLNT”) was liable for a judgment owed by XLN, Inc. (“XLN”), pursuant to this exception. XLNT and XLN lacked common shareholders and higher management; however, the *247corporations each employed the same two key employees in positions of authority and who, at all relevant times, were principal owners of the essential asset around which the business of the two corporations operated.
The…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Turner v. Bituminous Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Ramirez v. Amsted Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Berg Chilling Systems, Inc. v. Hull Corporation Sp Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lehman Bros. Holdings, Inc. v. Gateway Funding Diversified Mortgage Services, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
- Lehman Bros. Holdings, Inc. v. Gateway Funding Diversified Mortgage Services, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Smith, K. v. A.O. Smith Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
- Lehman Bros. Holdings v. Gateway Funding Diversified Mortgage ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Tender Touch Rehab Services, LLC v. Brighten at Bryn MawrDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.