Legal Opinion

Smith v. Meadows Mills, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided August 17, 1999No. 98-C-310PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

ADELMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Paul Smith and his subrogated insurer Travelers Property Casualty brought this products liability action against defendant Meadows Mills, Inc. Defendant now moves for summary judgment, arguing that it cannot be held liable under the doctrine of successor liability.

I. FACTS

In March 1997 plaintiff sustained a catastrophic head injury while operating and cleaning an edger saw manufactured in 1979 by Meadows Mill Company, Inc. (“Company”). Plaintiff alleges, and defendant does not at this time dispute, that a defect in the design of the edger…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Crutchfield v. Marine Power Engine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  2. United States v. Adaptive Microsystems, LLCUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
  3. Veritas Steel, LLC v. Lunda Construction CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Veritas Steel, LLC v. Lunda Constr. Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API