London Assur. Corporation v. Dean
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtBarcus, J.
This suit was instituted by defendant in error against plaintiff in error on an insurance policy for $700 which had been issued in his favor on one automobile, which burned during the period covered by said policy. Plaintiff in error contended it was not liable on the policy because of the following provision in the policy:
“The entire policy shall be void, unless otherwise provided by agreement in writing added thereto:
“(1) If the interest of the assured in the subject of insurance be other than unconditional and sole ownership, or in case of transfer or termination of the interest of .the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- East Texas Fire Insurance v. KempnerTexas Supreme Court · 1894
- Paragon Oil Syndicate v. Rhoades Drilling Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1925
- Foster v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. FlournoyTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Insurance Co. of North America v. WickerTexas Supreme Court · 1900
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. American Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Peterson v. Universal Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- North River Insurance v. WaddellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
- World Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. PuckettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Continental Ins. Co. v. MichaelsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.