Continental Ins. Co. v. Michaels

The stipulation in the policy set out in the statement above was a valid one, and, if it was violated, operated to relieve plaintiff in error of the liability defendant in error claimed against it. 26 C.J. 228 et seq. Did it appear that the stipulation had been violated? Plaintiff in error insists it did, in that the evidence conclusively showed, it says, a conditional, if not an absolute, sale of the coupé to Calloway. Defendant in error, on the other hand, insists that the transaction with Calloway did not affect defendant in error's interest in the property, because, he says, it passed to…