Legal Opinion

Paragon Oil Syndicate v. Rhoades Drilling Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1925No. 4261PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge BISHOP

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

The Court of Civil Appeals of the Second Supreme Judicial District certifies the question “whether or not the trial court erred in overruling the plea in abatement presented by appellant” in this case under the following statement:

“On September 29, 1922, G. M. Rhoades, C. E. Christie and C. Groves, as members of the co-partnership doing business under the name of Rhoades Drilling Company, instituted this suit against the Paragon Oil Syndicate (a common law company), John F. Nein, trustee, E. H. Nein, trustee, John…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fritts v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. State v. JulowSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Cashin v. PliterMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Gay v. . SeiboldNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  5. Wood v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Sixth RMA Partners, L.P. v. SibleyTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Lewis v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. v. TaborTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  4. Roper v. HallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Gorman v. GauseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API