Legal Opinion

Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. Flournoy

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1892No. 7210PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Ho statement is necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHEB, Judge,

Section B. — January 8, 1889, appellee instituted this suit against appellant upon a policy of insurance issued by appellant to Brady Bros., December 21, 1887, and running one year from date, for $1000, covering certain household furniture and property in a building used as a hotel in the city of Gainesville. October 1, 1888, the policy was by consent of appellant’s agent assigned to appellee by Brady Bros. The property was destroyed by fire October 20, 1888.

The appellant, with other issues presented in its answer, pleaded that the policy sued on contained a stipulation to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dickey v. HenarieOregon Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Fire Ass'n of Philadelphia v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. North River Insurance v. BelcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  4. London Assur. Corporation v. DeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  5. Delay v. TruittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API