Legal Opinion

Korf v. Lull

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1873PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scott

This proceeding was to establish a mechanic’s lien. The work and labor were performed and the materials furnished under a written contract to do the carpenter work, which, by the specifications, was to include the plastering, plumbing and painting on’a brick building which appellee was having erected on the premises described in the petition. Extra work was done, and materials furnished outside the contract, for which a lien is claimed.

The defense alleged in the answer is, the work was not finished within the time limited, nor was it done in accordance with the contract. It is insisted, by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McAuley v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  2. McAvoy v. LongIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Buskirk v. MurdenIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Packard v. Van SchoickIllinois Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Norton v. GaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Standard Supply Co. v. Carter HarrisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
  3. Ambrose v. BiggsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
  4. Seaside, City of v. RandlesOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. White v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API