Legal Opinion
Vance v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided April 3, 1997No. 2:96-cv-73096PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
ZATKOFF, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Before the Court is the recommendation of Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives on petitioners’ Motion for Return of Property pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(e). The Court finds that the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the parties’ briefs, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Therefore, pursuant to E.D. Mich. Local R. 7.1(e)(2), it is hereby Ordered that the motions be resolved on the briefs submitted.
On October 21, 1996, Magistrate Judge Komives recommended that the petitioners’…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re DanielsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- In Re FlemingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- United States v. MulliganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
- Obiukwu v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.