Obiukwu v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Joseph Obiukwu appeals pro se from a district court order that denied his motion for the return of property that had been seized during his criminal case. His appeal has been referred to a panel of this court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(1), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, the panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed in this case. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).
In 1992, Obiukwu was convicted of conspiring to distribute heroin and to possess heroin for intended distribution, violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) and 846. Our court affirmed his convictions on February 3, 1994, but…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Jeffrey Wayne DuncanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Tandy Corporation v. Malone & Hyde, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Twm Manufacturing Co., Inc. And Turner Quick Lift v. Dura CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- Vance v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- A.S. v. LeeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021
- Corizon, LLC v. WainwrightDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
- Johnston v. United States of America, TheDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2023