Carter v. United States
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the Court is Petitioner Derrick Deshawn Carter’s Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence and Motion for the Return of Property. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), this Court has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid in the disposition of these motions. For the reasons set forth below, this Court denies Petitioner’s motions.
Factual and Procedural Background
On March 25, 1993, a one-count indictment was returned against Petitioner and Timothy Redmond alleging that both possessed with…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Fairley v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
- Brooks v. MorrisonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Lavely v. LindseyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019