Legal Opinion

Carter v. United States

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 10, 2001No. Cr. 93-50024-02, Civ. 99-40001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GADOLA, District Judge.

Before the Court is Petitioner Derrick Deshawn Carter’s Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence and Motion for the Return of Property. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2), this Court has determined that oral argument will not significantly aid in the disposition of these motions. For the reasons set forth below, this Court denies Petitioner’s motions.

Factual and Procedural Background

On March 25, 1993, a one-count indictment was returned against Petitioner and Timothy Redmond alleging that both possessed with…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Barefoot v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fairley v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
  2. Brooks v. MorrisonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
  3. Lavely v. LindseyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API