Legal Opinion

Marlow v. Municipality of Anchorage

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1995No. S-5986PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Seeking to develop a cooperative senior citizen housing project on Tract 6 of the Arnold L. Muldoon Subdivision, appellant Marc Marlow petitioned the Anchorage Municipal Assembly to have the tract rezoned to accommodate his development plans. The Assembly passed an ordinance which rezoned Marlow’s property to a zoning classification compatible with Marlow’s proposed project. The ordinance contains the following provision:

Section S.d. Prior to the application for a building permit, a public hearing site plan review shall be conducted by the Planning and Zoning…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Lynden Transport, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Foreman v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Cook Inlet Native Ass'n v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Balough v. Fairbanks North Star BoroughAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ward v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Alaska Housing Finance Corp. v. SalvucciAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. City of Kenai v. Friends of the Recreation Center, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Boone v. GipsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API